演示文稿免费 已验证

咨询式逻辑演示文稿

围绕明确的管理决策制作演示文稿。每页用结论式标题提出观点,以聚焦的证据支撑,并通过深青色与琥珀色的视觉体系串联完整商业论证。

你会得到

  • 可离线使用的 16:9 HTML 演示文稿
  • 从问题到决策的结论式叙事
  • 标明来源或假设的图表与方案比较
  • 包含具体审批事项的结束页

适合

  • 管理层项目汇报
  • 客户战略建议
  • 软件投资商业论证
  • 以经营数据为依据的融资演示

不适合

  • 以图片为主、分析较少的主题演讲
  • 需要完全复刻现有企业模板的任务
  • 缺乏依据的市场或财务主张

你需要提供

  • 受众与需要作出的决策
  • 现有证据及其来源
  • 备选方案、建议与约束条件

运行要求

  • A modern browser
  • Node.js 20+ for the validator

运行成本

No external services. Runs entirely on your agent.

试试这个提示词

/sl-consulting-storyline-deck 为 Fictional Software Company 制作九页董事会演示文稿,从自动化决策和 38 天/22% 基线,讲到分阶段与整体替换的比较、试点关卡、价值验证、风险及审批。标题:“A phased onboarding upgrade can shorten time to value.” 结尾:“Approve the pilot and require evidence before a scale decision.” 采用 Verdict Margin 风格,简洁、注重证据。

后续提示词

  • 让管理层只读每页标题也能理解完整建议。
  • 为节省额估算增加敏感性分析。
  • 将文稿压缩为适合十分钟讨论的版本。

验证情况

已验证

render-checkpass4.0 / 526s

常见问题

只有零散笔记,没有完整大纲,可以使用吗?

可以。技能会将笔记整理成以决策为核心的叙事,并指出需要核实的证据缺口或假设。

能计算商业回报吗?

可以根据你提供的数据计算并展示假设,但不会把示例数字写成已验证的实际成果。

可以导出为 PDF 吗?

HTML 文稿适用于 16:9 放映,也支持在无需外部资源的情况下打印为 PDF。

SKILL.md

SKILL.md

Consulting Storyline Deck

Turn business evidence into an executive-ready deck with a recommendation that stays visible from opening to decision.

Style: Verdict Margin. Decisive and composed, with editorial typography and a bold canvas that keeps the argument in focus. Follow references/style-guide.md exactly.

Use this skill when

  • Executive steering committee updates
  • Client strategy recommendations
  • Software investment business cases
  • Fundraising narratives grounded in operating evidence

Do not use

  • An image-led keynote with little analytical content
  • A deck that must reproduce an existing corporate template exactly
  • Claims that require independent research when no source material or research access is available
  • To reproduce another company's brand, logo, product UI or copyrighted characters.

Inputs

  • Audience, decision sought, and presentation setting
  • Source material, including metrics, dates, definitions, and provenance
  • Current situation, alternatives considered, and preferred recommendation
  • Constraints, risks, and any claims that require qualification

If something essential is missing, ask one short question before starting. Never invent facts, numbers, quotes or customer names; mark gaps as [needs source].

Workflow

  1. Read all source material. Separate facts from opinions and keep the user's terminology; mark missing facts as [needs source] instead of inventing quotes, numbers or names.
  2. Write the title spine first: one action title per slide (a full sentence with a verb). Read the titles in order; they must make the argument on their own.
  3. Copy references/template.html to the output path, for example deck.html. Keep its paging engine, overview mode (press o), notes panel (press n) and print stylesheet intact.
  4. Apply the tokens from references/style-guide.md (they are already set in the template's :root); do not add other colors or webfonts.
  5. Choose layouts from references/layouts.md. Never use the same layout on more than two consecutive slides. Copy the matching example slide, fill every REPLACE_ value and delete unused examples.
  6. Keep body text under 40 words per slide; move detail into speaker notes. Write notes for every data-slide-id in window.__SLIDE_NOTES__; notes add delivery context and do not repeat the slide.
  7. Icons and diagrams are inline SVG only (the template's icon set or simple shapes in token colors). Never use emoji, icon fonts or remote images.
  8. Run the validator and fix every problem it reports:

``bash node scripts/validate-deck.mjs deck.html --expected-slides 8 ``

  1. Open the deck in a browser: check arrow keys, overview, notes, a 390px wide window and print preview (one 16:9 slide per page).

What makes this excellent

  • Write the governing recommendation first, then arrange slide titles so reading them alone forms a complete argument.
  • Separate observed facts, estimates, and proposed targets; label each visibly and never present an assumption as measured performance.
  • Build the case in decision order: stakes, evidence, options, economics, execution, risks, and approval request.
  • Make chart scales and comparison criteria consistent; place the takeaway next to the exhibit it interprets.
  • For a business case, reconcile baseline, investment, savings, and timing before presenting a return figure.
  • End with a specific decision, owner, and next milestone rather than a generic thank-you slide.

Output contract

  • One file, deck.html, 16:9, self-contained (no network requests, no storage APIs), opens from file://.
  • Exactly the requested number of section.slide elements, each with a unique data-slide-id and speaker notes.
  • A short hand-off note: slide count, layouts used, sources used, any [needs source] gaps, and the validator output.
  • Deliver one self-contained, offline-capable 16:9 HTML slide deck.
  • Include visible source or assumption notes for material claims and calculations.
  • Keep slide navigation and print-to-PDF output usable without network access.

Reference demo and agent run

The preview is a reference deck built from sample content. Figures on chart and stat slides are sample data and say so in the slide footer; image areas are labelled slots. In a real run the agent uses the user's sources and assets, adds a source note to every slide that states a figure or claim, and keeps every promise in the output contract above.

Failure rules

  • If the validator fails, fix the deck and run it again; do not hand over a failing deck.
  • If source material contradicts itself, show both claims and flag it in the notes instead of choosing one silently.
  • If the user needs an editable PowerPoint file, say that this skill delivers HTML before starting.

相似技能