演示文稿免费 已验证

文章简报演示文稿

把文章或研究资料整理成适合教学、课程设计和编辑评审的证据优先型演示文稿。它保持论断准确,同时让论证结构易于浏览、讲解和转化为行动。

你会得到

  • 采用编辑式模块网格的16:9 HTML演示文稿
  • 把研究发现转化为教学决策的行动式标题
  • 放置在相关论断旁的证据提示、限制条件和来源说明
  • 根据叙事需要选择图表、对比、时间线和信息卡片
  • 可改写为真实文章内容的完整示例演示文稿

适合

  • K-12课堂讲解和课程设计会议
  • 面向教育出版的研究型内容简报
  • 需要明确证据和后续行动的客户评审

不适合

  • 品牌营销或产品销售演示文稿
  • 完整学术论文或穷尽式文献综述
  • 依赖实时网络检索或外部字体的项目

你需要提供

  • 文章正文、摘要或研究笔记
  • 受众和年级
  • 学习或内容发布目标
  • 引用和术语限制

运行要求

  • A modern browser
  • Node.js 20+ for the validator

运行成本

No external services. Runs entirely on your agent.

试试这个提示词

/sl-article-brief-deck 为 Northfield Learning Lab 制作恰好9页演示文稿,介绍一篇关于课堂提取练习的虚构综述。从核心论断和证据讲到教学做法、局限及七年级三周试点。标题页写:“Retrieval practice can make science learning more durable”。结尾页写:“Start with three minutes, measure what students can explain later”。采用简洁的行动式标题和严格的黑白红模块网格。

后续提示词

  • 把这份演示文稿改成面向家长工作坊的版本,同时保留证据限定。
  • 把研究启示整理成一页教师实施简报。
  • 替换为我的文章,并标记每一条缺乏来源支持的论断。

验证情况

已验证

render-checkpass4.0 / 526s

常见问题

它可以简化技术性研究吗?

可以。它会根据受众调整表达,同时保留原始论断、证据边界和重要限定条件。

它会包含来源信息吗?

会。来源、日期、样本量和限制条件可以放在相关统计或论断旁边,保证演示时证据仍然可见。

它适合教学流程吗?

适合。它可以把文章连接到学习目标、讨论问题、常见误解和具体行动,同时明确区分来源内容与新增建议。

SKILL.md

SKILL.md

Article Brief Deck

Builds polished article brief decks for educators, curriculum teams, and content creators who need research translated into a clear, presentation-ready teaching or publishing plan.

Style: Gridline Article Brief. A disciplined editorial system that makes evidence easy to scan, compare, teach, and act on. Follow references/style-guide.md exactly.

Use this skill when

  • K-12 lesson explainers and curriculum planning meetings
  • Research-backed content briefs for education publishers
  • Client reviews where evidence and next actions must be explicit

Do not use

  • Marketing pitches, brand launches, or sales presentations that need persuasive product positioning
  • Long-form academic manuscripts, full literature reviews, or citation-management workflows
  • Decks that require live web research, proprietary fonts, or external assets unavailable to the renderer
  • To reproduce another company's brand, logo, product UI or copyrighted characters.

Inputs

  • The source article, abstract, research notes, or evidence packet to interpret
  • Audience, grade level, subject area, and intended learning or publishing outcome
  • Required claims, constraints, terminology, and citation details
  • Preferred number of slides and presentation context
  • Optional visual assets, data tables, or lesson standards

If something essential is missing, ask one short question before starting. Never invent facts, numbers, quotes or customer names; mark gaps as [needs source].

Workflow

  1. Read all source material. Separate facts from opinions and keep the user's terminology; mark missing facts as [needs source] instead of inventing quotes, numbers or names.
  2. Write the title spine first: one action title per slide (a full sentence with a verb). Read the titles in order; they must make the argument on their own.
  3. Copy references/template.html to the output path, for example deck.html. Keep its paging engine, overview mode (press o), notes panel (press n) and print stylesheet intact.
  4. Apply the tokens from references/style-guide.md (they are already set in the template's :root); do not add other colors or webfonts.
  5. Choose layouts from references/layouts.md. Never use the same layout on more than two consecutive slides. Copy the matching example slide, fill every REPLACE_ value and delete unused examples.
  6. Keep body text under 40 words per slide; move detail into speaker notes. Write notes for every data-slide-id in window.__SLIDE_NOTES__; notes add delivery context and do not repeat the slide.
  7. Icons and diagrams are inline SVG only (the template's icon set or simple shapes in token colors). Never use emoji, icon fonts or remote images.
  8. Run the validator and fix every problem it reports:

``bash node scripts/validate-deck.mjs deck.html --expected-slides 8 ``

  1. Open the deck in a browser: check arrow keys, overview, notes, a 390px wide window and print preview (one 16:9 slide per page).

What makes this excellent

  • Extract the article's central claim, evidence quality, audience relevance, and limitations before drafting slide copy.
  • Translate technical findings into classroom-appropriate language without adding claims that are absent from the source.
  • Give each slide an action title that states what the audience should understand or decide.
  • Use cards, timelines, comparisons, and charts only when they clarify the article's actual structure or evidence.
  • Place source cues, sample sizes, dates, and uncertainty beside the relevant claim rather than hiding them in a final note.
  • Keep examples fictional and generic when demonstrating the skill, while making the content specific enough to feel presentation-ready.

Output contract

  • One file, deck.html, 16:9, self-contained (no network requests, no storage APIs), opens from file://.
  • Exactly the requested number of section.slide elements, each with a unique data-slide-id and speaker notes.
  • A short hand-off note: slide count, layouts used, sources used, any [needs source] gaps, and the validator output.
  • A self-contained 16:9 HTML deck with 8-10 slides, editable text, and no external font or asset dependency.
  • A coherent article-to-brief narrative covering the claim, evidence, teaching implications, limitations, and next actions.
  • Evidence labels and qualifications remain visible on the slides where the associated claims appear.
  • The first slide uses the title layout and the deck uses at least six distinct layouts without repeating one layout three times consecutively.

Reference demo and agent run

The preview is a reference deck built from sample content. Figures on chart and stat slides are sample data and say so in the slide footer; image areas are labelled slots. In a real run the agent uses the user's sources and assets, adds a source note to every slide that states a figure or claim, and keeps every promise in the output contract above.

Failure rules

  • If the validator fails, fix the deck and run it again; do not hand over a failing deck.
  • If source material contradicts itself, show both claims and flag it in the notes instead of choosing one silently.
  • If the user needs an editable PowerPoint file, say that this skill delivers HTML before starting.

相似技能

文章简报演示文稿 · SkillLoom